Answer to Life, the Universe and Everything …

Archive for the 'Pseudoscience' Category

Top Ten Creationist Arguments

These videos may be a few months old, but they are quite good. They run through some of the many ridiculous arguments creationists often use.

Read Full Post »

Open-mindedness

This excellent YouTube video takes care of the accusation we sceptics often has thrown after us that we need to be more open-minded. This always bugs me because my inquisitive mind is very open to new ideas. I’ve spent most of this year learning quantum physics for fucks sake. Being open-minded is however not the [...]

Read Full Post »

The tension between science and religion

A talk by physicist Steven Weinberg. It is well worth the listen. “Steven Weinberg, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Texas at Austin, where he founded its Theory Group and holds the Josey Regental Chair of Science, was awarded the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics with colleagues Abdus Salam and Sheldon Glashow [...]

Read Full Post »

The Creationist “Museum”

The Secular Student Alliance and the biology professor PZ Myers went to visit the creationist “museum” in Kentucky. Myers wrote a blog post about it and some of the students put together a video series. It is well worth reading and watching for the pure entertainment value of it. Blogpost: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/08/the_creation_museum_1.php Videos: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/08/the_whole_experience.php

Read Full Post »

Liberals vs. Fundies

This story popped up both in my New Scientist and my Panda’s Thumb feeds today. New Scientist: Christians battle each other over evolution Panda’s Thumb: But it’s not about religion … So basically, we have the Discovery Institute, the pseudo-scientific Seattle organization, promoting Intelligent Design, who has launched a new website, Faith+Evolution. There they ask: [...]

Read Full Post »

Pigheaded Creationists

So, Michael Behe is still at it, 13 years after his book, Darwin’s Black Box, which has been a complete failure in proving Intelligent Design. Apparently a recent article in Science (or read the blog article) has caused Behe to write a letter in response, which Science did not wish to publish, naturally. Instead Behe [...]

Read Full Post »

Back to Top